Although there are many challenges in both buying and selling luxury real estate in today's economy, the luxury real estate market in Reno has been steady for most of 2010.

I have been working on our year-end reports for Montreux real estate and luxury real estate in Reno. (I will post this report soon). Despite the slow economy, we have made some home sales for our buyer and seller clients.

Here's a couple tips for both buyers and sellers of luxury real estate.

For Buyers:
Now is one of the best times in history to purchase the home of your dreams. Interest rates are still historically low, with the average long-term fixed-rate mortgage rates below 5%. Home prices remain low, and available homes on the market remain high.

Another important point to make for potential buyers is to find your comfort zone. How much do you plan to spend on your monthly mortgage? This decision should be part of your long-term financial picture.

What is the goal for buying a home? Are you looking to escape the high taxes of California? Do you want to live in a private golf community like Montreux? Now is the best time.

For Sellers:
If you are selling your home, and are worried about selling in a "buyer's market," there is some good news. If you get a lower selling profit when you sell your home, you may be able to offset a lower purchase price on your next home.

Whatever your reason for buying or selling luxury real estate in Reno Nevada, make sure to consult with a real estate agent that has a proven record, and past client testimonials and referrals.

If you are looking to purchase luxury real estate in Montreux, Reno, or Lake Tahoe I can help you find that great home! Please take a moment and fill out my contact form, or call me today: 775-813-4890.

Below is a great article from Investor's Business Daily about California and the situation the state is in. I found this article to be very relevant to the future of real estate in Nevada.

The 'Golden State' Still Doesn't Get It
by Investor's Business Daily

The midterm elections turned into a sweeping repudiation of the Democrats' failed status quo - except, that is, in California. There, not only did the Democrats not lose, they gained clout.

Even as voters in other states said they'd had enough of ever bigger, more intrusive and higher-cost government by the Democrats, California voters said, "More please."

With the exception of the governor's office, California has been a virtual one-party state since the 1960s. Now, thanks to decades of anti-business policies promulgated by a series of left-leaning legislatures, its economy and finances are a mess, and it's hemorrhaging jobs, businesses and productive entrepreneurs to other states.

This is especially true for Nevada. The tax advantages of Nevada make our state very appealing to savvy business owners and individuals. I get a dozen calls per week from people in California asking about luxury real estate in Reno. Most have already decided to leave the state, now they have to find a place to live.

The pattern continued on Tuesday, when voters rehired 1970s Democratic gubernatorial retread Jerry Brown and rejected moderate Republican and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina for far-left, five-term incumbent Sen. Barbara Boxer.

How bad has it gotten in the erstwhile Golden State? Consider:

* Some 2.3 million Californians are without jobs, for a 12.4% unemployment rate - one of the highest in the country.

* From 2001 to 2010, factory jobs plummeted from 1.87 million to 1.23 million - a loss of 34% of the state's industrial base. Ask any company, and it'll tell you the same thing: It's now almost impossible to build a factory in California.

* With just 12% of the U.S. population, California has almost a third of the nation's welfare recipients. Some joke the state motto should be changed from "The Golden State" to "The Welfare State." Meanwhile, 15.3% of all Californians live in poverty.

* The state budget gap for 2009-10 was $45.5 billion, or 53% of total state spending - the largest in any state's history.

* The state's sales tax is the nation's highest, and its income tax the third-highest, the BusinessInsider.com Web site recently noted. Meanwhile, the Tax Foundation's "State Business Tax Climate Index" ranks California 48th.

* In a ranking by corporate relocation expert Ronald Pollina of the 50 states based on 31 factors for job creation, California finished dead last.

* In another ranking, this one by the Beacon Hill Institute on state competitiveness, California came in 32nd - down seven spots in just one year.

* California is home to 25% of America's 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants. A 2004 study estimated that illegals cost the state's citizens $10.5 billion a year - roughly $1,200 per family.

* Unfunded pension liabilities for California's state and public employees may be as much as $500 billion - roughly 17% of the nation's total $3 trillion at the state and local level.

This has been building for decades. Yet, despite the abysmal track record, Democrats in this election not only won six of the state's seven top jobs, they extended their hold over the state legislature, too. The GOP gained a record 680 seats in statehouses nationwide on Tuesday. In California, they gained none.

Even Democratic candidate Jenny Oropeza, who died two weeks ago, still managed to defeat live Republican John Stammreich in a race for a state Senate seat.

California really bucked the national trend.

"Democrats had a 13-point party identification advantage among California voters, compared with an even split nationwide," wrote Jack Pitney, a professor at Claremont McKenna College, on the National Review's blog. "California voters approved of President Obama's performance by a 10-point margin, whereas the national electorate disapproved by nine points.

"It's a different kind of state," he said. That may be the understatement of 2010.

A large part of the state's Democratic tilt comes from its massive Latino population. The Los Angeles Times noted that it made up 22% of the voting pool, "a record tally that mortally wounded many Republicans."

Indeed, Latinos went for Democrats by 2-to-1 - perhaps ending the naive idea of some in the GOP of a New Majority built on the burgeoning Latino population.

But the real political problem lies in Sacramento, the state capital, which is run not so much by politicians as by the unions they've sold out to - state employees, nurses, teachers and prison guards.

For their part, politicians have largely ignored the state's crumbling infrastructure, failing schools and dismal job market. And it's about to get worse.

Voters also approved a new measure requiring a simple legislative majority to approve a state budget. It previously took two-thirds, giving Republicans far more leverage. Democrats, in other words, will now find it even easier to spend money they don't have.

Moreover, as its tax base shrivels, the state is lurching ever closer to fiscal insolvency. At some point, it will ask Congress for a bailout, and how likely is that with the new Republican majority?

It is my opinion that not only will Congress bail California out, but they will try to find more and more ways to bring revenues in. If you're a business owner... look out. Higher taxes and more fees are coming your way. This is great news for Nevada businesses and Nevada real estate.

Worse is the feeling among the state's businesses of an entrenched, almost pathological antipathy toward any job-creating activity.

As Cypress Semiconductor CEO T.J. Rodgers memorably put it: "The killer factor in California for a manufacturer to create, say, 1,000 blue-collar jobs is a hostile government that doesn't want you there and demonstrates it in thousands of ways."

So far this year, thanks to California's unfriendly political environment, strict regulations and high taxes, 32 companies have announced they'll either expand elsewhere, move or shut down operations, according to the California Manufacturers & Technology Association.

For many, it's as simple as ABC - Anywhere But California. This is an issue near and dear to our hearts. Investor's Business Daily was founded in 1983 in Los Angeles - and for a quarter of a century has proudly called California its home.

But we too have been affected by the state's poisonous, anti-business political environment. With de facto one-party rule in the state since the 1960s and few signs of change anytime soon, our optimism about the state's future has begun to wane.

As a result, sad to say, much of IBD's future growth will happen at a new facility in Texas - where local and state authorities have bent over backwards to make us feel welcome.

California was once like Texas, but lost its way. Today, when comparisons are made, California is most often compared to Greece - another idyllic place with a sunny, Mediterranean climate on the verge of bankruptcy.

In the end, only the voters of California can change things. But on election day, they opted for more of the same governance that will only make conditions worse.

As I said in the beginning, Northern Nevada is a great place to live and run your business. Reno is a great city... beautiful scenery, great restaurants, plenty of things to do! It's time for you to seriously consider leaving the traffic and smog. Please read this post about why you should consider buying real estate in Montreux and living in Northern Nevada. As always, my team and I are here to help you find the best luxury real estate in Northern Nevada and Montreux homes for sale.

If you would like to be added to our Montreux Real Estate newsletter list, please fill out my contact form.

Original article from the Wall Street Journal
States hungry for revenue are turning to taxpayers to make up the shortfall as they deplete rainy-day and economic-stimulus funds. To avert a popular revolt, many are resorting to a so-called millionaire's tax, which puts the burden on a smaller group of the very well-heeled.

A flurry of rate increases occurred this year, and tax analysts say the trend will accelerate in 2010.

In response, some wealthy residents are rethinking their financial strategies, including where they reside. They may see some sense to moving before they sell a business, for example, or stop using certain kinds of trusts.

Doug Stanley, an attorney in the St. Louis office of law firm Bryan Cave LLP, said high personal income-tax rates are "definitely on the radar" of the wealthy clients he advises.

For the rich in California, the question can be "do you really need to live in this state when you have a state next door that has a zero income-tax rate?" said Don Weigandt, a wealth adviser in the Los Angeles office of J.P. Morgan Private Bank. That next-door neighbor is Nevada.

Californians, who have a top individual rate of 10.55% on income over $1 million, actually gained in sideways fashion from recent rate raises around the country. The state dropped below Hawaii, Oregon and New Jersey on the list of places with the highest individual tax rates.

Hawaii enacted a top individual rate of 11% on income over $200,000, Oregon has a new 11% rate on income over $250,000, and New Jersey enacted a 10.75% rate on income above $1 million.

The conservative-leaning Tax Foundation in Washington tracks individual income tax rates, and Joseph D. Henchman, its tax counsel and director of state projects, predicts more states will follow suit with rate increases next year.

If state revenues haven't recovered by then, he said, "we'll see a bitter fight over huge budget shortfalls across the country." Historically, state revenues recover after the general economic recovery, so the chances of such a scenario are high, Mr. Henchman said.

"These millionaire's tax increases will be very appealing because they help a short-term problem, even though they cause significant long-term damage," he said.

The policy of raising state rates on the rich has failed before.

Through the early 1990s, several states maintained double-digit income-tax rates, but eventually brought them down partly because legislators realized they were driving out entrepreneurs. To keep good talent, create jobs and drive economic growth, state tax systems had to be competitive with their neighbors.

Mr. Weigandt said the issue of high rates comes up with his clients most often in the context of selling a business. The question then is "what can I do about my taxes," and it can be tempting to relocate when the answer is that the tax bill could be cut by as much as 40% by just changing residence to Florida, Texas, Washington, Wyoming or another state with low or zero personal income tax.

Picking up stakes needs careful thought and planning, though. States have gotten increasingly aggressive about tracking former residents and seeking taxes from them after they have moved.
###

In the private, gated community of Montreux, we have seen a lot of buyers coming from California simply because of the taxes. The Nevada tax advantages are enough in most cases for luxury real estate buyers to move their businesses (and their families) to Nevada. Most have found Reno to be a great area for business, recreation and family life.

To learn more about Montreux real estate opportunities, or other luxury Reno real estate, please contact Brooke Sullivan today.